DONATOR ONLY PREMIUM CONTENT - For more information on donator levels click here

 

 

If your donator status is incorrect, please contact Michael at operations@freedomainradio.com with the relevant information.

 

Freedomain Radio Amazon Affiliate Links: United States - Canada - United Kingdom

Welcome to Freedomain Radio Message Board

If you're interested in joining the philosophical discussion, click "sign in" or "create account" on the right of the page. If you're creating a new account, please be sure to include an explanation as to why you're interested in joining the message board community. This verification requirement is included to cut down on possible spam accounts.

 

If you have supported Freedomain Radio financially and would like immediate access to the message board - or - your donation status is incorrect, please contact Michael at operations@freedomainradio.com with your Paypal email/Bitcoin address/etc as well as your board account name and the situation will be addressed ASAP.

 

We just upgraded the board software, and now your email address is used to log in. If you're having trouble, please Contact Us.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ccuthbert

Darwin's Myth is not "quite credible"

185 posts in this topic
 

How do either of those things even explain the first thing on the list from the link which states:

"The bone is like no other bone on Earth. Its biochemical signature is much richer in collagen than regular bone."?

Can you give an answer to my question? or did you just say Hydrocephalus and Progeria without checking if they can actually explain all of the anomalies of the Starchild skull?

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy wants $10 for a book "disproving" Darwin.  Now if he could actually do that he'd get the Nobel prize worth $1M.  His name would be internationally known.  There would be TENS OF THOUSANDS of preachers urging their followers to buy his book, each convincing dozens of followers to buy his book.  Yet he's not on any bestseller lists.  Not even the ludicrously non-credible creationists have praised him have they?  And yet you expect us to believe that a theory that has withstood criticism for over 150 years is destroyed by your little text?  Note that he claims that these criticisms were known from the start, so they've clearly been discredited for over 100 years.  Stop wasting our time.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People won't buy the book because they would assume it is propaganda. He wouldn't get a Nobel prize. The Nobel prize doesn't go to the most deserving because it is politically biased, that is how Obama got the Nobel peace prize. Preachers won't pay for people to buy his book disproving evolution if the book claims the alternative to evolution is alien creation. Besides, Christianity is starting to accept evolution, and they are not considering it as much as a threat. As for evolution withstanding 150 years of criticism, Christianity withstood 2000 years of criticism, and it is today the world's most popular religion. So withstanding criticism means nothing.

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People won't buy the book because they would assume it is propaganda. He wouldn't get a Nobel prize. The Nobel prize doesn't go to the most deserving because it is politically biased, that is how Obama got the Nobel peace prize. Preachers won't pay for people to buy his book disproving evolution if the book claims the alternative to evolution is alien creation. Besides, Christianity is starting to accept evolution, and they are not considering it as much as a threat. As for evolution withstanding 150 years of criticism, Christianity withstood 2000 years of criticism, and it is today the world's most popular religion. So withstanding criticism means nothing.

People would buy the book. He could get a Nobel prize. The Nobel peace prize is different from the Scientific prizes. Preachers would pay for a book that disproves evolution even if the alternative is alien creation. Evolution withstood 150 years of scientific criticism. Christianity did not. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People would buy the book. He could get a Nobel prize. The Nobel peace prize is different from the Scientific prizes. Preachers would pay for a book that disproves evolution even if the alternative is alien creation. Evolution withstood 150 years of scientific criticism. Christianity did not. 

Such a book is freely available here: http://dcrain.zftp.com/info/Intervention%20Theory.pdf and not enough people are reading it even though it can be obtained online for free and preachers aren't paying the book's author. In actuality, evolution withstood 150 years of pseudo-scientific criticism.

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Preface
This eBook is designed to explain the essential
aspects of Intervention Theory that anyone new
to it, or interested in learning more about it, will
need to know. It is grounded in solid, reliable
academic research, though it is not footnoted or
annotated because there is no point in doing so.
Statements made by alternative researchers like
me are automatically contradicted by scientists
insisting we are not simply wrong, but stupidly
wrong. They further insist we have no right to
challenge their cherished beliefs because our
only “credentials” are an unwarranted faith in
our ability to discern truth from nonsense.
[This doesn’t refer to
all
scientists. Some still
willingly risk reputation and security to explore
topics that defy dogma. However, they are
few
.]
Every point I discuss is supported by facts in
available research, but I am often criticized by
skeptics. Why? Because the issues I discuss are
long-lived sacred cows to mainstream sciences.
They protect their herd
with admirable tenacity,
as I would if I had somehow joined their ranks.
Looking back, I’m delighted I managed to find
a different herd to look
after, because I’m sure
those areas of study will lead to our true future.
Also, this eBook contains a small amount of
repetition. The best way to learn anything, to
make it stick in memory like velcro, is to use a
technique known as
Programmed Learning
.
Years ago, school workbooks had sentences
containing blank segments to be filled in by
students. They were in
termittently repetitive,
which subtly enhanced memory. Workbooks
are no longer used as much, but intermittent
repetition remains a useful learning tool.
This eBook’s purpose is to introduce readers to
highly controversial concepts they should easily
absorb and, more importantly, recall with some
detail for later discussion
and, if needed, debate
with friends and family not yet familiar with the
basic evidence supporting Intervention Theory.

So I read the preface and I have decided this book is silly. It says there is evidence, but it is not provided through link or source or otherwise. After all, evidence need not be provided.

 

Then it plays the persecution for beliefs card as they are not respected because they do not provide hard and consistent evidence and ignore contradictory evidence. Of course, this is because they are die-hard scientists out to get these theoreticians.

 

Then the book proclaims that the best way to indoctrinate is through steady repetition and so facts and evidence are non-existent in the book, but they will repeat non-sense that is unproven over and over so that you will be programmed to repeat it to others.

 

I think that there are better uses of my time to say the least. Logic can't even be pretended to be put forward in the preface then the book is not even worth the effort to read it.

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I read the preface and I have decided this book is silly. It says there is evidence, but it is not provided through link or source or otherwise. After all, evidence need not be provided.

 

Then it plays the persecution for beliefs card as they are not respected because they do not provide hard and consistent evidence and ignore contradictory evidence. Of course, this is because they are die-hard scientists out to get these theoreticians.

"Every point I discuss is supported by facts in available research"

You have the ability to check the validity of the points made by doing your own research. You are complaining that he is making you use Google searches the validate his claims. I don't see why he has to spoon feed you sources.

 

 

 

Then the book proclaims that the best way to indoctrinate is through steady repetition and so facts and evidence are non-existent in the book, but they will repeat non-sense that is unproven over and over so that you will be programmed to repeat it to others.

 

You don't know if he repeats unproven nonsense, because you did not read past the preface.

-2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this discussion has been going on for a while now, and I'm just curious: Have any of those disagreeing with Rainbow Dash actually read the book he's suggesting you read?

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this discussion has been going on for a while now, and I'm just curious: Have any of those disagreeing with Rainbow Dash actually read the book he's suggesting you read?

Which book? And no. For my part, I was more interested in addressing Rainbow Dash's misunderstandings around evolution than discussing the starchild a deformed human skull (which only really became a topic of discussion in the last page or so).

 

edit: a word

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites