<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://board.freedomainradio.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'Logic', 'theism', and 'evil'</title><link>http://board.freedomainradio.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Logic,theism,evil&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'Logic', 'theism', and 'evil'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 (Build: 30417.1769)</generator><item><title>Re: My Defense of Agnosticism</title><link>http://board.freedomainradio.com/forums/p/18188/147825.aspx#147825</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">59c0a406-59fe-4f33-8532-f7cd028d5483:147825</guid><dc:creator>bearded spock</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am a fellow agnostic, but I reject your argument.&amp;nbsp; Empirical evidence is neither needed or relevant to evaluating the truth or falsity of a logical statement such as &amp;quot;self-contradictory entities cannot exist.&amp;quot; Logic is not validated by observation. It is validated or falsified&amp;nbsp; by aherence to or divergence from the rules of logic.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the risk of descending into the death spiral of semantics, I will claim that self-contradictory entities CANNOT exist by definition.&amp;nbsp; Either a=b or a/=b.&amp;nbsp; A cannot both equal and not equal b. The JudeoIslamoChristian god cannot exist without distorting language beyond all meaning. Theodicy&amp;nbsp; disproves a perfectly good AND omnipotent god with the existence of evil. Also, it is self-cantradictory to have a perfectly just AND merciful god, without merely defining away the contradiction.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>