-
In presenting the argument for private property via ethics, a respondent claimed that "ownership" is a misplaced concretion within the argument. To me, ownership seems entirely concrete, as one must exercise self ownership in order to respond and say, "this is a misplaced concretion"...
-
ok i can see you'd be the last person on the world if i had to choose someone to help me make a dictionary. so if u wanted to put definition of love u would write: involuntary response to virtue. that's great.(not). It's like defining airplane by thing that flies, or car by thing that runs...
-
Stef, I completely understand where you are coming from about debating with Michael. If he doesn't believe the problem is really a problem, then you won't be able to communicate with him. Or at least communicate with a purpose. It might be me, but during your response, parts of it, especially...
-
Don't forget you rarely ever, ever change someone's mind during a discussion. When I listened to the first couple podcasts I was still disagreeing with much of what Stef was saying. I was curious and interested. Stef came off calm and sympathetic to a lack of knowledge on my part. It wasn't...
-
That debate between you and Michael(?) managed to successfully compress just about every question you've ever dealt with into one neat two-hour pill! * Aren't people too ignorant? * What about the helpless? * What about the power vacuum? * What about Human Biology (Human Nature)? * The Gun in...
-
i think i have discovered an error in communication that lead to podcast 337 and 338. in my opinion, the meat of 337 about the property rights post could have been taken care of in a post on the boards. a little back and forth could have cleared it up. stef used a post I made heavily in the podcast and...
Page 1 of 1 (6 items)