I haven't posted very much for the last week or so. I am most motivated to post when I've just learned something new, but since my false self thinks it knows everything and I've been very much up my false self's ass these past few days, I haven't wanted to write much, or really be around FDR at all.
Firstly I apologise to those people I've spoken to who in any way had to endure my false self whining and intellectualising. I am so, so sorry. This is the first time I've really felt myself backslide since I encountered FDR. It's almost as if i woke up just now to discover some evil entity had taken over for a few days, like being possessed by a Goa'uld out of Stargate SG1.
--
Now I listened to podcast FDR362 today - "Forget about Offense" (or Offence, if yer a Brit). It struck a chord with me because it's basically about some fellow complaining about Stef mocking views he thinks are absurb or self-contradictory. I thought Stef's riposte was great (basically that only the false self ever takes offence at such things, and anyway why should he care about someone's irrational beliefs when they cause so much grief and pain in the world?), and it was a great smackdown for my own false self which has been getting out of hand again.
Despite a growing awareness of the asinine activities of the false self, if someone with authority makes an argument I consider flawed, even if I agree with the conclusion, I feel significant anxiety. It's not just any authority, but rather those who I associate myself with (in a narcissistic fashion). So in my childhood I would be as ashamed of my mother's values as she was of mine. And today, I feel a huge emotional tension if Stef uses an argument I think is flawed, especially if he then mocks or ridicules those who disagree with him.
My false self of course loves to latch onto this tension and indulge in some mighty Stef-correction - because of course the most important thing I can do to make the world a better place is argue with Stef, whose certainty and willingness to face the slings and arrows of the naysayers has helped me distinguish my own mystical murky false self and empirical honest true self for the first time in my life. Yea, verily, that's clearly what I should be spending my time on. 
Next thing I know, I'm whining about logical flaws in the free will debate, or complaining that UPB is incomprehensible, when I don't even care about these things. So what if Stef is wrong? So what if he mocks my arguments? What's that got to do with my happiness? Since when did he become a proxy for my mother?
It's sickening how completely the false self can take over and make itself the normal appropriate response to emotional distress. And once in place, it deletes any ability to perceive anything honestly without the layer upon layer of made-up story and rationalisation. Please, my friends, if you see me delving into intellectualisation, kick me. I've no business getting involved in intellectual debates when I still get all false-selfy about it. Don't be shy, just tell me. If you're wrong, my true self won't mind the self-examination.
Flipping between true and false self feels like having two completely incompatible worldviews, and neither makes sense from the perspective of the other. It's absolutely effing brilliant to have someone like Stef in my face who's able and willing to just point out false self activities with no fear. It's my hope that some day I'll be competent and healthy enough to declare war on the false self just as Stef has done.
--
While I'm writing, some people have asked me how my first therapy session went yesterday. In fact it was just a 30 minute introduction, but I did get to talk about about why I wanted to get into therapy, so I talked about frozen emotions, intellectual defences, the possibility of defooing, and other things. The therapist didn't offer me any feedback in this first session, just mmhmm'ed a lot at varying volumes which seemed to reflect the emotional weight behind what I was saying. He is a therapist of the humanistic person-centred school, which is somewhat out of favour these days in favour of the cognitive behavioural therapy crowd, and he had a bit of a complain at the start about how government contracts all go to CBT counsellors these days, because that's the style that is most interested in goal-setting and collecting statistics about success rates.
I felt very comfortable with him. My first full session is next Monday, and I'm very looking forward to it. Oh, and his rates were half-price because I'm not working at the moment, which was a relief. He seemed very interested to do some childhood archeology with me, so i think he will be very helpful in helping me understand what was going on during all that.
Hope this is interesting for people. It's been useful for me to write down, and a few people told me they were wondering what had been going on for me. Last week I attended a friend's wedding, and it really forced me into false-self-mode (all that shallow socialising), which I didn't even notice at first, but then which really began to take over my life again to the point where FDR started to feel 'boring' and 'pointless' and maybe just downright wrong - which of course it would from the false self perspective. Fortunately something I read about Stef triggered some major emotions in me, and like the telephones in the Matrix movie, emotions are the way out back to the real world of the true self.
~Tess
ps @Luke ... so sorry for getting all maddeningly intellectual at you these past two days - you did a fine job helping me.