Let's pick up where your deleted message in this thread, read:
Burden of proof isn't on him, it's on you.
That's fine. Here's what I think about it.
something to be said for labels here. Gay
jew academics don’t seem to understand that they’re mimicking straight, white
heterosexual Christians every step of the way, but of course with a slightly
different slant on things. Unlike lesbian
academics who came to be scorned for “man-hating,” which essentially was penis
envy, the gay jew academic has his own appeal.
He’s a clinical, scientific creature, mostly harmless, but always given
over to wildly delirious rants on the nature of human sexuality, as “science.” Analysis is at the forefront of all things
here. What gay jews so desperately seek
to understand is not the sexual drive of the heterosexual male, which he can
never comprehend, but his own, complex yearnings for another male. It’s the male form, the “maleness,” the scent,
the buttocks, limbs, anus and penis that gay academics are after. Michelangelo’s David. And this somehow becomes “academic.”
to understand about that. Nothing very
scientific about that. Human sexuality
is uncomplicated as, say, the desire for food or water. But then it suddenly becomes “theoretical”
and given over to “analysis” in the hands of Gender Studies folks, whose
academic training is grounded in the humanities, e.g. multiculturalism, queer
theory, materialist feminist “studies” that are about as abysmal and
self-centered as their whimsical speculations on an orgasm. What makes an orgasm? Why are we wired differently to have orgasms?
as well be asking why there are so many gay, jewish academics, and why, they
attempt to turn sex into “science” vis-à-vis Foucault, perhaps, and perhaps
intertwined with a tad bit of Freud, a speckling of Althusser, because they’re
in search of a theory. They essentially need
to explain the need to stick a baseball bat up the anus in order to get off. What's wrong with this picture is there's not much to theorize about.