DailyPaul.com published only the excerpt, not the entire article (which seems to be from 2006). Anyway, I don't necessarily see a problem with publishing voluntaryist articles on predominantly non-voluntaryist sites. If that never happened how would their readership be exposed to these ideas, short of stumbling on them elsewhere? Spreading the idea everywhere should have no exceptions.
Let's be DoublePlusHuman so "1984" forever remains only fiction. -- Daniel Memenode