nexalacer:I still haven't heard a convincing proof that not voting does anything to oppose the state. Prove it.
Not voting is opposing, to one degree or another. It's impossible to say you oppose the state when you vote. Okay, it's not impossible to say it, but any logical consistency is right out the window.
...They are more likely to embrace market anarchy than they would listening to four to eight years of Clinton's socialist garbage.
If you look through past threads you'll see that some of the most ridiculous and illogical debates have been with minarchists. I don't think your assertion is at all correct if this board can be used as evidence - they're more likely to be minarchists for a while, sure, but how long does that last? How long until the whole game is ramped back up again?
If you don't wanna vote, fine. Don't. It's the beauty of being free, correct? I can't make you do what I am doing.
But the guy you're voting for can. That's the problem.
EDIT:
Oops, I posted my thing right after Stef. Sorry, you can delete it if you'd like.